§ 504B
- Citation
- § 504B
- Parent Document
- Mary Cocchiarella v. Donald Driggs, 884 N.W.2d 621 (2016)
- Jurisdiction
- Minnesota (state)
- Effective Date
- 2016-08-31
Other Sections in This Document (444)
- Mary Cocchiarella v. Donald Driggs, 884 N.W.2d 621 (2016)
- Mary Cocchiarella v. Donald Driggs, 884 N.W.2d 621 (2016)
- Mary Cocchiarella v. Donald Driggs, 884 N.W.2d 621 (2016)
- Mary Cocchiarella v. Donald Driggs, 884 N.W.2d 621 (2016)
- Mary Cocchiarella v. Donald Driggs, 884 N.W.2d 621 (2016)
- Mary Cocchiarella v. Donald Driggs, 884 N.W.2d 621 (2016)
- Mary Cocchiarella v. Donald Driggs, 884 N.W.2d 621 (2016)
- Mary Cocchiarella v. Donald Driggs, 884 N.W.2d 621 (2016)
- Mary Cocchiarella v. Donald Driggs, 884 N.W.2d 621 (2016)
- Mary Cocchiarella v. Donald Driggs, 884 N.W.2d 621 (2016)
- Mary Cocchiarella v. Donald Driggs, 884 N.W.2d 621 (2016)
- Mary Cocchiarella v. Donald Driggs, 884 N.W.2d 621 (2016)
- Mary Cocchiarella v. Donald Driggs, 884 N.W.2d 621 (2016)
- Mary Cocchiarella v. Donald Driggs, 884 N.W.2d 621 (2016)
- Mary Cocchiarella v. Donald Driggs, 884 N.W.2d 621 (2016)
- Mary Cocchiarella v. Donald Driggs, 884 N.W.2d 621 (2016)
- Mary Cocchiarella v. Donald Driggs, 884 N.W.2d 621 (2016)
- Mary Cocchiarella v. Donald Driggs, 884 N.W.2d 621 (2016)
- Mary Cocchiarella v. Donald Driggs, 884 N.W.2d 621 (2016)
- Mary Cocchiarella v. Donald Driggs, 884 N.W.2d 621 (2016)
- Mary Cocchiarella v. Donald Driggs, 884 N.W.2d 621 (2016)
- Mary Cocchiarella v. Donald Driggs, 884 N.W.2d 621 (2016)
- Mary Cocchiarella v. Donald Driggs, 884 N.W.2d 621 (2016)
- Mary Cocchiarella v. Donald Driggs, 884 N.W.2d 621 (2016)
- Mary Cocchiarella v. Donald Driggs, 884 N.W.2d 621 (2016)
- Mary Cocchiarella v. Donald Driggs, 884 N.W.2d 621 (2016)
- Mary Cocchiarella v. Donald Driggs, 884 N.W.2d 621 (2016)
- Mary Cocchiarella v. Donald Driggs, 884 N.W.2d 621 (2016)
- Mary Cocchiarella v. Donald Driggs, 884 N.W.2d 621 (2016)
- Mary Cocchiarella v. Donald Driggs, 884 N.W.2d 621 (2016)
- Mary Cocchiarella v. Donald Driggs, 884 N.W.2d 621 (2016)
- Mary Cocchiarella v. Donald Driggs, 884 N.W.2d 621 (2016)
- Mary Cocchiarella v. Donald Driggs, 884 N.W.2d 621 (2016)
- Mary Cocchiarella v. Donald Driggs, 884 N.W.2d 621 (2016)
- Mary Cocchiarella v. Donald Driggs, 884 N.W.2d 621 (2016)
- Mary Cocchiarella v. Donald Driggs, 884 N.W.2d 621 (2016)
- Mary Cocchiarella v. Donald Driggs, 884 N.W.2d 621 (2016)
- Mary Cocchiarella v. Donald Driggs, 884 N.W.2d 621 (2016)
- Mary Cocchiarella v. Donald Driggs, 884 N.W.2d 621 (2016)
- Mary Cocchiarella v. Donald Driggs, 884 N.W.2d 621 (2016)
- Mary Cocchiarella v. Donald Driggs, 884 N.W.2d 621 (2016)
- Mary Cocchiarella v. Donald Driggs, 884 N.W.2d 621 (2016)
- Mary Cocchiarella v. Donald Driggs, 884 N.W.2d 621 (2016)
- Mary Cocchiarella v. Donald Driggs, 884 N.W.2d 621 (2016)
- Mary Cocchiarella v. Donald Driggs, 884 N.W.2d 621 (2016)
- Mary Cocchiarella v. Donald Driggs, 884 N.W.2d 621 (2016)
- Mary Cocchiarella v. Donald Driggs, 884 N.W.2d 621 (2016)
- Mary Cocchiarella v. Donald Driggs, 884 N.W.2d 621 (2016)
- Mary Cocchiarella v. Donald Driggs, 884 N.W.2d 621 (2016)
- Mary Cocchiarella v. Donald Driggs, 884 N.W.2d 621 (2016)
- Mary Cocchiarella v. Donald Driggs, 884 N.W.2d 621 (2016)
- Mary Cocchiarella v. Donald Driggs, 884 N.W.2d 621 (2016)
- Mary Cocchiarella v. Donald Driggs, 884 N.W.2d 621 (2016)
- Mary Cocchiarella v. Donald Driggs, 884 N.W.2d 621 (2016)
- Mary Cocchiarella v. Donald Driggs, 884 N.W.2d 621 (2016)
- Mary Cocchiarella v. Donald Driggs, 884 N.W.2d 621 (2016)
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- § 504B
- section 504B
- section 504B
- section 504B
- section 504B
- section 504B
- section 504B
- section 504B
- section 504B
- section 504B
- section 504B
- section 504B
- section 504B
- section 504B
- section 504B
- section 504B
- section 504B
- section 504B
- section 504B
- section 504B
- section 504B
- section 504B
- section 504B
- section 504B
- section 504B
- section 504B
- section 504B
- section 504B
- section 504B
- section 504B
- section 504B
- section 504B
- section 504B
- section 504B
- section 504B
- section 504B
- section 504B
- section 504B
- section 504B
- section 504B
- section 504B
- section 504B
- section 504B
- section 504B
- section 504B
- section 504B
- section 504B
- section 504B
- section 504B
- section 504B
- section 504B
- section 504B
- section 504B
- section 504B
- section 504B
- section 504B
- section 504B
- section 504B
- section 504B
- section 504B
- section 504B
- section 504B
- section 504B
- section 504B
- section 504B
- section 504B
- section 504B
- section 504B
- section 504B
- section 504B
- section 504B
- section 504B
- section 504B
- section 504B
- section 504B
- section 504B
- section 504B
- section 504B
- section 504B
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
- § 645
Full Text
1,888 chars5
The dissent and MMHA argue that policy considerations—discouraging false or
harassing claims—require us to interpret the phrase “residential tenant” as incorporating a
physical occupancy requirement. We disagree. First, the dissent erroneously explores
legislative intent, including policy arguments, contrary to our canons of statutory
interpretation. Because the statute is not ambiguous, the court is precluded from exploring
the spirit or purpose of the law. Minn. Stat. § 645.16; Premier Bank v. Becker Dev., LLC,
785 N.W.2d 753, 759 (Minn. 2010). Second, the unlawful exclusion or removal statute
already includes various protections against abuses by those claiming to be “residential
tenants.” Courts are not empowered to grant relief simply because a petitioner believes
she has been wrongfully excluded. On the contrary, a petitioner must provide a “verified”
petition or affidavit providing a “specific” statement of facts that “clearly” establishes the
“unlawfulness” of the exclusion or removal from the premises. Minn. Stat. § 504B.375,
subd. 1(b)(2), (c). If a petitioner fails to do so, the judicial officer can, and should, deny
the immediate possession requested. In the event that immediate possession is wrongfully
granted, a landlord has a clear, speedy, effective, and equivalent remedy. Specifically, if
possession by the petitioner is wrongful, a landlord may obtain a dissolution of the order;
obtain an equivalent writ of eviction; and recover costs, damages, and fees caused by the
tenant’s wrongful possession. Id., subd. 2. This ability to recover costs, damages, and fees
protects landlords by dissuading those with false, harassing, or even tenuous claims from
obtaining wrongful possession of residential properties.
13
DISSENT ANDERSON, Justice (dissenting).