DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Mary Cocchiarella v. Donald Driggs, 884 N.W.2d 621 (2016)

Citation
Mary Cocchiarella v. Donald Driggs, 884 N.W.2d 621 (2016)
Parent Document
Mary Cocchiarella v. Donald Driggs, 884 N.W.2d 621 (2016)
Jurisdiction
Minnesota (state)
Effective Date
2016-08-31
Original Source
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/4252990/mary-cocchiarella-v-donald-driggs/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (444)

Full Text

508 chars 
Cocchiarella argues on appeal that she qualifies as a “residential tenant” under Minn.Stat. § 504B.375, and is therefore entitled to recovery of the leased premises. According to Cocchiarella, the present legal right of occupancy is sufficient to qualify as a “residential tenant” under section 504B.375, because actual, physical occupancy of the premises is not required. Driggs responds that absent actual, physical occupancy of the leased premises, Cocchiarella may not bring a petition under the statute.