Mary Cocchiarella v. Donald Driggs, 884 N.W.2d 621 (2016)

Citation: Mary Cocchiarella v. Donald Driggs, 884 N.W.2d 621 (2016)
Parent Document: Mary Cocchiarella v. Donald Driggs, 884 N.W.2d 621 (2016)
Jurisdiction: Minnesota (state)
Effective Date: 2016-08-31
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/4252990/mary-cocchiarella-v-donald-driggs/ ↗

Full Text

681 chars

. A similar threat arose here. Although Coc-chiarella knew that Driggs still physically occupied the allegedly leased dwelling, Coc-chiarella’s counsel proposed, at the ex parte hearing on the lockout petition, that the referee "enter an order directing ... that Driggs must vacate the property,” Had the referee agreed and issued such an. order, Driggs would have been summarily evicted from his own dwelling, based on a disputed oral lease agreement, with no opportunity to respond before'the order was issued, despite his position that no lease agreement was made and the lack of actual occupancy by Cocchiarella. --- 010combined --- STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A14-1876

Other Sections in This Document (444)

Full Text