Section 2

Citation: Section 2
Parent Document: Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
Jurisdiction: Vermont (state)
Effective Date: 2015-08-11
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/4489499/highgate-housing-limited-partne... ↗

Full Text

694 chars

13
2013 until October of 2014, never received any notice of either an increase or decrease in
rent. It was obvious that their rental payment would change as a result of the change in
jobs in December 2013 and January 2014, but the Lease required a 30-day advance notice
of any increase in rental amount due, and they never received such a notice until October
of 2014. While it is true that they did not provide paystubs, the evidence is not clear that
they knew on an ongoing basis that Plaintiff was holding them to an obligation on the
Intake Form signed in December, and would use the failure to adhere to that obligation as
a basis for charging 9 months’ worth of retroactive market rent.

Other Sections in This Document (94)

Full Text