Section 2

Citation: Section 2
Parent Document: Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
Jurisdiction: Vermont (state)
Effective Date: 2015-08-11
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/4489499/highgate-housing-limited-partne... ↗

Full Text

838 chars

He began work for ARIS in mid-January, but because his employer did not immediately
complete the required background check for the type of work he did, and because he could not
receive pay until the background check had cleared, he did not begin to receive any pay for
several weeks. Tenants paid no rent in January or February. Karissa MacAulay testified that she
believed no rent was due because they had no income. They had provided notice and signed all
requested waivers. Although no paperwork changing the subsidy was processed at that time,
when processing later occurred, the tenants were treated as having had no income for that period,
and charged retroactively with only nominal rent of $22 per month rather than the previous rent
of $610 per month. Plaintiff does not claim any more than $22 per month for January or
February.

Other Sections in This Document (94)

Full Text