Section 2

Citation: Section 2
Parent Document: Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
Jurisdiction: Vermont (state)
Effective Date: 2015-08-11
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/4489499/highgate-housing-limited-partne... ↗

Other Sections in This Document (94)

Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2

Full Text

558 chars

Many facts are undisputed. From March through November, household income was
above the amount that would have qualified for a subsidy, and during that period Defendants
paid only $500 in total. Joshua had provided timely releases for verification of his status and
income from both his old employer and his new one. He did not provide paystubs from ARIS.
Plaintiff recognized that he had no income in January and February. No 30-day notice of rent
increase was ever provided to Defendants. No 10-day notice of loss of subsidy was ever
provided to Defendants.