Section 2

Citation: Section 2
Parent Document: Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
Jurisdiction: Vermont (state)
Effective Date: 2015-08-11
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/4489499/highgate-housing-limited-partne... ↗

Full Text

1,101 chars

There are two problems with this argument. First, Paragraph 4 continues by
providing that even under Paragraph 4, the Landlord is required to implement rent
changes in accordance with HUD procedures and time frames, and further requiring the
30-day advance written notice of any increase except for the exceptions in paragraphs 11,
15, and 17, which have already been determined above to be inapplicable. Second,
while, depending on the circumstances, it could be reasonable for a landlord to require
paystubs to be provided, the concentrated reliance on Joshua himself having to provide
the paystubs (based on the Intake Form) is unreasonable when the content was either
available to Plaintiff or in Plaintiff’s possession as verification from mid-January on until
it acted on that information in October. It was not reasonable for Plaintiff to rely on
noncompliance with the Intake Form “certification” as a reason to delay the Interim
Recertification, certainly not past July, especially when there is insufficient evidence of
Plaintiff having reminded Joshua of the necessity of that information.1

Other Sections in This Document (94)

Full Text