Section 2

Citation: Section 2
Parent Document: Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
Jurisdiction: Vermont (state)
Effective Date: 2015-08-11
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/4489499/highgate-housing-limited-partne... ↗

Other Sections in This Document (94)

Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2

Full Text

547 chars

7
met his responsibility to provide information. Plaintiff’s position was that it did not need to act
on the Interim Recertification until Joshua had provided paystubs. Plaintiff’s evidence is that
from January on, Plaintiff’s manager had not been able to complete verification due to tenants’
failure to provide the necessary paystubs, despite the fact that Plaintiff had directly from ARIS
both a verification statement of employment and amount of compensation, and a printout of
actual income for every paycheck from January through July 18th.