Section 2

Citation: Section 2
Parent Document: Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
Jurisdiction: Vermont (state)
Effective Date: 2015-08-11
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/4489499/highgate-housing-limited-partne... ↗

Other Sections in This Document (94)

Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2

Full Text

583 chars

Plaintiff is understandably frustrated that Defendants’ income for March to November
was sufficient to pay market rent and Defendants paid only $500. The issue, however, is
whether, based on the terms of the lease, Plaintiff is entitled to claim unpaid rent for March on in
any amount greater than $22 per month. If, as Defendants claim, they were only obligated to pay
$22 per month from March on, they have overpaid, and there is no basis for eviction. If
Plaintiff’s claim for greater rent is justified, they have underpaid, and Plaintiff is entitled to
possession and a judgment.