Section 31
- Citation
- Section 31
- Parent Document
- 250 LLC v. Photopoint Corp.(usa), 32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 296 (2005)
- Jurisdiction
- California (state)
- Effective Date
- 2005-07-28
Other Sections in This Document (165)
- 250 LLC v. Photopoint Corp.(usa), 32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 296 (2005)
- 250 LLC v. Photopoint Corp.(usa), 32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 296 (2005)
- 250 LLC v. Photopoint Corp.(usa), 32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 296 (2005)
- 250 LLC v. Photopoint Corp.(usa), 32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 296 (2005)
- 250 LLC v. Photopoint Corp.(usa), 32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 296 (2005)
- 250 LLC v. Photopoint Corp.(usa), 32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 296 (2005)
- 250 LLC v. Photopoint Corp.(usa), 32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 296 (2005)
- 250 LLC v. Photopoint Corp.(usa), 32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 296 (2005)
- 250 LLC v. Photopoint Corp.(usa), 32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 296 (2005)
- section 6
- section 6
- section 6
- section 6
- section 6
- section 6
- section 6
- section 6
- section 6
- section 6
- section 6
- section 6
- section 6
- section 6
- section 6
- section 6
- section 6
- section 6
- section 6
- section 6
- section 6
- section 6
- section 6
- section 6
- section 6
- section 6
- section 6
- section 6
- section 6
- section 6
- section 6
- section 6
- section 6
- section 6
- section 6
- section 6
- section 6
- section 6
- section 6
- section 6
- section 6
- section 6
- section 6
- section 6
- section 1951
- section 1951
- section 1951
- section 1951
- section 1951
- section 1951
- section 1951
- section 1951
- section 1951
- section 1951
- section 1951
- section 1951
- section 1951
- section 1951
- section 1951
- section 1951
- section 1951
- section 1951
- section 1951
- section 1951
- section 1951
- section 1951
- section 1951
- section 1951
- section 1951
- section 1951
- section 1951
- section 1951
- section 1951
- section 1951
- section 1951
- section 1951
- section 1951
- section 1951
- section 1951
- section 1951
- section 1951
- section 1951
- section 1950
- section 1950
- section 1950
- section 1950
- section 1950
- section 1950
- section 1950
- section 1950
- section 1950
- Section 31
- Section 31
- Section 31
- Section 31
- Section 31
- Section 31
- Section 31
- Section 31
- Section 31
- Section 31
- Section 31
- Section 31
- Section 31
- Section 31
- Section 31
- Section 31
- Section 31
- Section 31
- Section 31
- Section 31
- Section 31
- Section 31
- Section 31
- Section 31
- Section 31
- Section 31
- Section 31
- Section 31
- Section 31
- Section 31
- Section 31
- Section 31
- Section 31
- Section 31
- Section 31
- Section 31
- Section 31
- Section 31
- Section 31
- Section 31
- Section 31
- Section 1950
- Section 1950
- Section 1951
- Section 1951
- Section 1951
- Section 1951
- Section 1951
- Section 1951
- Section 1951
- Section 1951
- Section 1951
- Section 1951
- Section 1951
- Section 1951
- Section 1951
- Section 1951
- Section 1951
- Section 1951
- Section 1951
- Section 1951
- Section 1951
- Section 30
- Section 1954
- Section 1954
Full Text
478 chars250 and PhotoPoint intended for the security deposit to be available for application against future rent under the lease if PhotoPoint defaulted. However, the evidence was unnecessary for that purpose because, as we have acknowledged, that intention was reasonably apparent from the size of the security deposit alone. The question is not whether the parties intended to permit the security deposit to be used for future rent, it is whether they intended to waive section 1950.7