section 6

Citation: section 6
Parent Document: 250 LLC v. Photopoint Corp.(usa), 32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 296 (2005)
Jurisdiction: California (state)
Effective Date: 2005-07-28
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2281319/250-llc-v-photopoint-corpusa/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (165)

250 LLC v. Photopoint Corp.(usa), 32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 296 (2005)
250 LLC v. Photopoint Corp.(usa), 32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 296 (2005)
250 LLC v. Photopoint Corp.(usa), 32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 296 (2005)
250 LLC v. Photopoint Corp.(usa), 32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 296 (2005)
250 LLC v. Photopoint Corp.(usa), 32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 296 (2005)
250 LLC v. Photopoint Corp.(usa), 32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 296 (2005)
250 LLC v. Photopoint Corp.(usa), 32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 296 (2005)
250 LLC v. Photopoint Corp.(usa), 32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 296 (2005)
250 LLC v. Photopoint Corp.(usa), 32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 296 (2005)
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1950
section 1950
section 1950
section 1950
section 1950
section 1950
section 1950
section 1950
section 1950
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1951
Section 1951
Section 1951
Section 1951
Section 1951
Section 1951
Section 1951
Section 1951
Section 1951
Section 1951
Section 1951
Section 1951
Section 1951
Section 1951
Section 1951
Section 1951
Section 1951
Section 1951
Section 1951
Section 30
Section 1954
Section 1954

Full Text

533 chars

Bankruptcy? (2001) 26 Cal. Bankr. J. 44, 47, italics added.) Moreover, if 250’s construction of section 1950.7 were adopted, landlords could retain security deposits well beyond the statutory deadline in every case, on the ground that the deposit “might” not cover prospective damages, and could do so with relative impunity given the modest penalty for acting in bad faith. Such a result would thwart the statutory purpose of compelling the prompt refund of security deposits. (See Granberry v. Islay Investments, supra, at p. 746.)