Skip to main content
INTERNAL PROTOTYPE — NOT LEGAL ADVICE — DO NOT SEND

250 LLC v. Photopoint Corp.(usa), 32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 296 (2005)

Citation
250 LLC v. Photopoint Corp.(usa), 32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 296 (2005)
Parent Document
250 LLC v. Photopoint Corp.(usa), 32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 296 (2005)
Jurisdiction
California (state)
Effective Date
2005-07-28

Other Sections in This Document (165)

Full Text

225 chars
We conclude that 250 violated section 1950.7 by retaining the security deposit to cover its damages for future rent owed under the lease, because section 1950.7 allows a security deposit to be applied only against unpaid *709