section 6

Citation: section 6
Parent Document: 250 LLC v. Photopoint Corp.(usa), 32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 296 (2005)
Jurisdiction: California (state)
Effective Date: 2005-07-28
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2281319/250-llc-v-photopoint-corpusa/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (165)

250 LLC v. Photopoint Corp.(usa), 32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 296 (2005)
250 LLC v. Photopoint Corp.(usa), 32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 296 (2005)
250 LLC v. Photopoint Corp.(usa), 32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 296 (2005)
250 LLC v. Photopoint Corp.(usa), 32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 296 (2005)
250 LLC v. Photopoint Corp.(usa), 32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 296 (2005)
250 LLC v. Photopoint Corp.(usa), 32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 296 (2005)
250 LLC v. Photopoint Corp.(usa), 32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 296 (2005)
250 LLC v. Photopoint Corp.(usa), 32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 296 (2005)
250 LLC v. Photopoint Corp.(usa), 32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 296 (2005)
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 6
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1951
section 1950
section 1950
section 1950
section 1950
section 1950
section 1950
section 1950
section 1950
section 1950
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 31
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1951
Section 1951
Section 1951
Section 1951
Section 1951
Section 1951
Section 1951
Section 1951
Section 1951
Section 1951
Section 1951
Section 1951
Section 1951
Section 1951
Section 1951
Section 1951
Section 1951
Section 1951
Section 1951
Section 30
Section 1954
Section 1954

Full Text

461 chars

at p. 690), and requires that the deposit be returned to the extent it is not necessary for those limited purposes. Since those observations apply equally to section 1950.7, 250’s reliance on presection 1950.7 cases for a contrary rule is misplaced. The more recent cases cited by 250 — Kraus v. Trinity Management Services, Inc., supra, 23 Cal.4th 116, and California Safety Center, Inc. v. Jax Car Sales, supra, 164 Cal.App.3d 992 — are also inapposite. Kraus