Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)

Citation
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Parent Document
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Jurisdiction
Washington (state)
Effective Date
2000-01-10

Other Sections in This Document (56)

Full Text

292 chars
Hanline argues that the summary proceeding available under RCW 59.18.380 is unconstitutional. He claims the show cause proceeding does not provide a full and fair opportunity to be heard because direct and cross-examinations are unavailable. Carlstrom did not address this issue in her brief.