Skip to main content
INTERNAL PROTOTYPE — NOT LEGAL ADVICE — DO NOT SEND

Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)

Citation
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Parent Document
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Jurisdiction
Washington (state)
Effective Date
2000-01-10

Other Sections in This Document (56)

Full Text

584 chars
On April 5,1998, Carlstrom served Hanline with a second eviction notice. This notice informed Hanline that the lease would terminate on April 30, 1998. The notice stated that the reason for termination was that “[t]he owner and/or immediate family needs the unit and there is no comparable vacant unit available in the house.” Hanline was the sole remaining tenant in the rooming house and Carlstrom says she planned to use the entire house for her son. Han-line complained again to DCLU. The DCLU informed Carlstrom that verification of the stated reasons for termination was needed.