Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
- Citation
- Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
- Parent Document
- Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
- Jurisdiction
- Washington (state)
- Effective Date
- 2000-01-10
Other Sections in This Document (56)
- Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
- Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
- Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
- Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
- Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
- Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
- Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
- Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
- Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
- Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
- Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
- Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
- Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
- Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
- Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
- Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
- Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
- Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
- Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
- Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
- Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
- Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
- Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
- Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
- Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
- Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
- Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
- Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
- Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
- Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
- Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
- Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
- Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
- Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
- Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
- Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
- Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
- Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
- Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
- Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
- Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
- Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
- Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
- Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
- Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
- Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
- Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
- Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
- Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
- Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
- Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
- Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
- Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
- Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
- Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
- Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Full Text
515 charsAs a threshold matter, we must determine what the lease agreement executed on November 26, 1997, provides and whether it is ambiguous. Paragraph one of the agreement contains a commencement date of October 2, 1997, and a duration provision specifically identifying the lease termination date as April 1, 1998. The section identifying the term by number of months was not completed. Paragraph 16 provides that the “$200 deposit is non-refundable if [the] tenant moves out within [the] first 6 months(Emphasis added.)