Skip to main content
INTERNAL PROTOTYPE — NOT LEGAL ADVICE — DO NOT SEND

Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)

Citation
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Parent Document
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Jurisdiction
Washington (state)
Effective Date
2000-01-10

Other Sections in This Document (56)

Full Text

403 chars
refundable. This term may have proven more beneficial for the tenant with respect to return of his security deposit, since when read with the earlier commencement date of October 6, it would provide for earlier eligibility for return of the deposit. While this provision potentially benefited the tenant, it had no affect upon and created no ambiguity as to the term of the lease or the expiration date.