Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)

Citation: Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Parent Document: Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Jurisdiction: Washington (state)
Effective Date: 2000-01-10
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2615504/carlstrom-v-hanline/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (56)

Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)

Full Text

466 chars

Hanline claims that he was improperly denied a jury trial. Hanline argues that the commissioner erred by failing to assign the case for trial because his right to a jury trial under article I, section 21 of the Washington Constitution is lost. Carlstrom says that although Commissioner Reiman failed to direct the parties to proceed to trial, Hánline retains his jury trial right because he could simply request a trial date in the usual complaint and answer manner.