Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)

Citation: Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Parent Document: Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Jurisdiction: Washington (state)
Effective Date: 2000-01-10
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2615504/carlstrom-v-hanline/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (56)

Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)

Full Text

440 chars

Hanline argues that the JCEO requires the landlord to identify the reasons and provide facts supporting the decision to evict the tenant. Hanline says that improper notice undermines the court’s jurisdiction. Hanline also argues that he was evicted in retaliation of his complaints to the DCLU. Carlstrom argues that Hanline’s lease had expired and therefore neither the JCEO nor the rebuttable presumption applies. We agree with Carlstrom.