Skip to main content
INTERNAL PROTOTYPE — NOT LEGAL ADVICE — DO NOT SEND

Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)

Citation
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Parent Document
Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)
Jurisdiction
Washington (state)
Effective Date
2000-01-10

Other Sections in This Document (56)

Full Text

357 chars
ments from the parties and granted a writ of restitution in favor of Carlstrom and judgment against Hanline for attorney’s fees and costs. Commissioner Reiman found that (1) the eviction was not retaliatory, (2) there were no factual issues requiring trial assignment, (3) the lease was not ambiguous, and (4) Seattle’s JCEO did not bar the eviction action.