Lincoln Place Tenants Ass'n v. City of Los Angeles, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 120 (2007)

Citation: Lincoln Place Tenants Ass'n v. City of Los Angeles, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 120 (2007)
Parent Document: Lincoln Place Tenants Ass'n v. City of Los Angeles, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 120 (2007)
Jurisdiction: California (state)
Effective Date: 2007-10-10
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2294826/lincoln-place-tenants-assn-v-ci... ↗

Full Text

581 chars

(1983) 33 Cal.3d 850, 865 [191 Cal.Rptr. 800, 663 P.2d 523].) Furthermore, where one or more statutes appear to be in conflict, we must seek to avoid repeal of any statute by implication. “ ‘ “[T]he presumption against implied repeal is so strong that, ‘To overcome the presumption the two acts must be irreconcilable, clearly repugnant, and so inconsistent that the two cannot have concurrent operation. The courts are bound, if possible, to maintain the integrity of both statutes if the two may stand together.’ ” ’ [Citation.]” (Stop Youth Addiction, Inc. v. Lucky Stores, Inc.

Other Sections in This Document (194)

Full Text