Section 42
- Citation
- Section 42
- Parent Document
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Jurisdiction
- Minnesota (state)
- Effective Date
- 2003-04-22
Other Sections in This Document (72)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
Full Text
646 charsThe district court also found that “it is likely that Louis McCray was staying at the apartment without prior approval, in violation of the lease.” This finding is supported by the language of the lease and by Sgt. O’Leary’s testimony that when he followed Artravis to appellants’ unit after the April 17 incident, McCray, who was in the apartment, stated that he was “staying” there. While appellants argue that McCray’s statement that he was “staying” at appellants’ apartment does not support a finding that he was living there in violation of the lease, the record supports the district court’s determination that a violation was “likely.” 10