Section 42
- Citation
- Section 42
- Parent Document
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Jurisdiction
- Minnesota (state)
- Effective Date
- 2003-04-22
Other Sections in This Document (72)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
- Section 42
Full Text
778 charsNotwithstanding the trial court’s misplaced reliance on late rent payments, the remaining factors relied upon by the court amply support the “good cause” determination. Appellants’ lease provides that a tenancy can be terminated for “police calls to an apartment for noise disturbances, domestic disputes, illegal substances and other non-medical reasons.” The district court found that throughout appellants’ tenancy, “approximately 40 police calls” had been made to their apartment, the latest occurring on April 17, 2002. This finding is supported by the testimony of Sgt. O’Leary and Officer Rauenhorst. We recognize that appellants originated some of the calls and that adverse action cannot be taken against tenants who call the police for their own health and safety. See