Skip to main content
INTERNAL PROTOTYPE — NOT LEGAL ADVICE — DO NOT SEND

Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)

Citation
Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
Parent Document
Cimarron Village v. Washington, 659 N.W.2d 811 (2003)
Jurisdiction
Minnesota (state)
Effective Date
2003-04-22

Other Sections in This Document (72)

Full Text

537 chars
Cimarron Village informed Washington in August 1998 that it did not intend to renew her lease. Washington challenged this decision, arguing that because her lease was for a federally subsidized housing unit, it could not be terminated without “good cause.” This court agreed, reversed the district court’s grant of summary judgment to Cimarron Village, and remanded for further proceedings. Cimarron Village Townhomes, Ltd. v. Washington, No. C3-99-118, 1999 WL 538110 (Minn.App. *814 July 27, 1999). 3 In doing so, this court noted that