Section 47a-21

Citation: Section 47a-21
Parent Document: Carrillo v. Goldberg, 141 Conn. App. 299 (2013)
Jurisdiction: Connecticut (state)
Effective Date: 2013-03-19
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/7914988/carrillo-v-goldberg/ ↗

Full Text

775 chars

The court did not specify its rulings with respect to the plaintiffs’ breach of fiduciary duties and breach of contract claims. As the judgment file states, however, that the court found “the issues on the [cjomplaint for the [pjlaintiffs,” we conclude that this is an appealable final judgment. See Rent-A-PC, Inc. v. Rental Management, Inc., 96 Conn. App. 600, 604 n.3, 901 A.2d 720 (2006) (“[ajlthough it is preferable for a trial court to make a formal ruling on each count, we will not elevate form over substance when it is apparent from the memorandum of decision that the trial court found in favor of the plaintiff’). Moreover, we need not address specifically the claims of breach of fiduciary duty or breach of contract, as they are not the subject of this appeal.

Other Sections in This Document (52)

Full Text