Section 47a-21

Citation: Section 47a-21
Parent Document: Carrillo v. Goldberg, 141 Conn. App. 299 (2013)
Jurisdiction: Connecticut (state)
Effective Date: 2013-03-19
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/7914988/carrillo-v-goldberg/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (52)

Carrillo v. Goldberg, 141 Conn. App. 299 (2013)
Carrillo v. Goldberg, 141 Conn. App. 299 (2013)
Carrillo v. Goldberg, 141 Conn. App. 299 (2013)
Carrillo v. Goldberg, 141 Conn. App. 299 (2013)
Carrillo v. Goldberg, 141 Conn. App. 299 (2013)
Carrillo v. Goldberg, 141 Conn. App. 299 (2013)
Carrillo v. Goldberg, 141 Conn. App. 299 (2013)
Carrillo v. Goldberg, 141 Conn. App. 299 (2013)
Carrillo v. Goldberg, 141 Conn. App. 299 (2013)
Carrillo v. Goldberg, 141 Conn. App. 299 (2013)
Carrillo v. Goldberg, 141 Conn. App. 299 (2013)
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21

Full Text

465 chars

The plaintiffs argue that because the defendants’ detention of their money was wrongful, the court should have awarded prejudgment interest. While the plaintiffs have provided us with a hypothetical rationale for why the court could have exercised its discretion to award prejudgment interest, they have not shown how, on this record, the court abused its discretion by choosing not to award it. Absent such a showing, we will not disturb the decision of the court.