Carrillo v. Goldberg, 141 Conn. App. 299 (2013)
- Citation
- Carrillo v. Goldberg, 141 Conn. App. 299 (2013)
- Parent Document
- Carrillo v. Goldberg, 141 Conn. App. 299 (2013)
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut (state)
- Effective Date
- 2013-03-19
Other Sections in This Document (52)
- Carrillo v. Goldberg, 141 Conn. App. 299 (2013)
- Carrillo v. Goldberg, 141 Conn. App. 299 (2013)
- Carrillo v. Goldberg, 141 Conn. App. 299 (2013)
- Carrillo v. Goldberg, 141 Conn. App. 299 (2013)
- Carrillo v. Goldberg, 141 Conn. App. 299 (2013)
- Carrillo v. Goldberg, 141 Conn. App. 299 (2013)
- Carrillo v. Goldberg, 141 Conn. App. 299 (2013)
- Carrillo v. Goldberg, 141 Conn. App. 299 (2013)
- Carrillo v. Goldberg, 141 Conn. App. 299 (2013)
- Carrillo v. Goldberg, 141 Conn. App. 299 (2013)
- Carrillo v. Goldberg, 141 Conn. App. 299 (2013)
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
Full Text
416 charsWe address first the plaintiffs’ claim regarding the court’s failure to award them double damages under *307§ 47a-21 (d). The plaintiffs argue that the court’s award of only $4800 for the defendants’ failure to return their security deposit was improper because § 47a-21 (d) requires an award of double damages when a tenant’s security deposit is not returned in the fashion prescribed by this subsection.7 We agree.