Skip to main content
INTERNAL PROTOTYPE — NOT LEGAL ADVICE — DO NOT SEND

Section 1942

Citation
Section 1942
Parent Document
Drouet v. Superior Court, 73 P.3d 1185 (2003)
Jurisdiction
California (state)
Effective Date
2003-08-11

Other Sections in This Document (188)

Full Text

1,002 chars
We find that the Ellis Act qualifies as a "law pertaining to the hiring of property" under section 1942.5, subdivision (d), and that a landlord's withdrawal of the property from the market is an exercise of "`the right to go out of the rental business'" (First Presbyterian Church v. City of Berkeley (1997) 59 Cal.App.4th 1241, 1253, 69 Cal.Rptr.2d 710) under that law. We further conclude, in accordance with subdivisions (d) and (e) of section 1942.5, that a landlord's bona fide intent to withdraw the property from the rental market under the Ellis Act will defeat the statutory defense of retaliatory eviction. Because the trial court did not consider the landlord's motion for summary adjudication under this standard, we reverse the Court of Appeal, which had issued a writ of mandate directing the superior court to grant the landlord's motion for summary adjudication, with directions to remand the matter to the superior court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. BACKGROUND