Section 1942

Citation: Section 1942
Parent Document: Drouet v. Superior Court, 73 P.3d 1185 (2003)
Jurisdiction: California (state)
Effective Date: 2003-08-11
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2585536/drouet-v-superior-court/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (188)

Drouet v. Superior Court, 73 P.3d 1185 (2003)
Drouet v. Superior Court, 73 P.3d 1185 (2003)
Drouet v. Superior Court, 73 P.3d 1185 (2003)
Drouet v. Superior Court, 73 P.3d 1185 (2003)
Drouet v. Superior Court, 73 P.3d 1185 (2003)
Drouet v. Superior Court, 73 P.3d 1185 (2003)
Drouet v. Superior Court, 73 P.3d 1185 (2003)
Drouet v. Superior Court, 73 P.3d 1185 (2003)
Drouet v. Superior Court, 73 P.3d 1185 (2003)
Drouet v. Superior Court, 73 P.3d 1185 (2003)
Drouet v. Superior Court, 73 P.3d 1185 (2003)
Drouet v. Superior Court, 73 P.3d 1185 (2003)
Drouet v. Superior Court, 73 P.3d 1185 (2003)
Drouet v. Superior Court, 73 P.3d 1185 (2003)
Drouet v. Superior Court, 73 P.3d 1185 (2003)
Drouet v. Superior Court, 73 P.3d 1185 (2003)
Drouet v. Superior Court, 73 P.3d 1185 (2003)
Drouet v. Superior Court, 73 P.3d 1185 (2003)
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942

Full Text

673 chars

To overcome the presumption that the landlord has a bona fide intent to withdraw his property from the rental market, the tenant will have to produce *602admissible evidence, evidence sufficient to justify a judgment for the tenant, that the landlord intends to re-rent the property. (Cf. Texas Dept. of Community Affairs v. Burdine (1981) 450 U.S. 248, 254-255 [67 L.Ed.2d 207, 101 S.Ct. 1089] [once a prima facie showing of discrimination has been made, the burden shifts to the defendant to rebut the presumption by producing admissible evidence, sufficient to justify a judgment for the defendant, that its action was taken for a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason].)