Section 14
- Citation
- Section 14
- Parent Document
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Jurisdiction
- United States (federal)
- Effective Date
- 1984-01-30
Other Sections in This Document (102)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
- Section 14
Full Text
805 charsOn December 13, 1982, the district court entered partial summary judgment on that portion of the complaint alleging that the retroactive operation of section 14 violated the impairment of contract and taking clauses. Reasoning that the alterations authorized by the Act “amount to a serious disruption of the grantee’s expectations,” the district court held that section 14 violated the impairment of contract clause, as interpreted in United States Trust Co. v. New Jersey, 431 U.S. 1, 97 S.Ct. 1505, 52 L.Ed.2d 92 (1977). The court also held that because section 14 applied to premises already converted, it violated the federal constitutional prohibition against uncompensated takings, as interpreted in Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp., 458 U.S. 419, 102 S.Ct. 3164, 73 L.Ed.2d 868 (1982).