Skip to main content
INTERNAL PROTOTYPE — NOT LEGAL ADVICE — DO NOT SEND

Eliason v. Harrison (2018)

Citation
Eliason v. Harrison (2018)
Parent Document
Eliason v. Harrison (2018)
Jurisdiction
Vermont (state)
Effective Date
2018-06-26

Full Text

511 chars
Yet, because Terry, L’Esperance, and Bisson involved substantive code violations, they
can be read to stand for the proposition that regulatory non-compliance may, but need not
necessarily, violate the Consumer Protection Act. Just as de minimis housing code violations
standing alone do not breach the warranty of habitability under the Residential Rental
Agreements Act, see Hilder v. St. Peter, 144 Vt. 150, 160 (1984), it is not necessarily the case
that any regulatory non-compliance would violate the CPA.