INTERNAL PROTOTYPE — NOT LEGAL ADVICE — DO NOT SEND

Eliason v. Harrison (2018)

Citation
Eliason v. Harrison (2018)
Parent Document
Eliason v. Harrison (2018)
Jurisdiction
Vermont (state)
Effective Date
2018-06-26
Original Source
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/10026732/eliason-v-harrison/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (41)

Full Text

495 chars 
Summary judgment is appropriate where there are no genuine issues of material fact and
the moving party demonstrates it is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. See H&E Equip.
Servs., Inc. v. Cassani Elec., Inc., 2017 VT 17, ¶ 10; V.R.C.P. 56(a). The moving party has the
burden to prove that no genuine dispute of material fact exists, while the opposing party must be
given the benefit of all reasonable doubts and inferences. Couture v. Trainer, 2017 VT 73, ¶ 9. I. Consumer Protection Act