INTERNAL PROTOTYPE — NOT LEGAL ADVICE — DO NOT SEND

Summers v. Crestview Apartments, 2010 MT 164 (2010)

Citation
Summers v. Crestview Apartments, 2010 MT 164 (2010)
Parent Document
Summers v. Crestview Apartments, 2010 MT 164 (2010)
Jurisdiction
Montana (state)
Effective Date
2010-07-27
Original Source
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/889353/summers-v-crestview-apartments/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (530)

Full Text

447 chars 
¶28 Clearly this accelerated rent provision unreasonably favors Crestview. A more equitable result would have been for Crestview to continue charging Summers rent on a monthly basis until the apartment was rented to a new tenant. This approach would not unreasonably favor either party, while maintaining the intent of the *132original agreement. Thus, we conclude that the accelerated rent provision is unconscionable and therefore unenforceable.