Wash. Supreme Court published opinion — 942099.pdf
- Citation
- Wash. Supreme Court published opinion — 942099.pdf
- Jurisdiction
- Washington (state)
- Source verification
- official_capture_completeness_unverified
- Original Source
- https://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/942099.pdf ↗
Related Parts of This Source
- Wash. Supreme Court published opinion — 942099.pdf
- Wash. Supreme Court published opinion — 942099.pdf
- Wash. Supreme Court published opinion — 942099.pdf
- Wash. Supreme Court published opinion — 942099.pdf
- Wash. Supreme Court published opinion — 942099.pdf
- Wash. Supreme Court published opinion — 942099.pdf
- Wash. Supreme Court published opinion — 942099.pdf
- Wash. Supreme Court published opinion — 942099.pdf
- Wash. Supreme Court published opinion — 942099.pdf
- Wash. Supreme Court published opinion — 942099.pdf
- Wash. Supreme Court published opinion — 942099.pdf
- Wash. Supreme Court published opinion — 942099.pdf
- Wash. Supreme Court published opinion — 942099.pdf
- Wash. Supreme Court published opinion — 942099.pdf
- Wash. Supreme Court published opinion — 942099.pdf
- Wash. Supreme Court published opinion — 942099.pdf
- Wash. Supreme Court published opinion — 942099.pdf
- Wash. Supreme Court published opinion — 942099.pdf
- Wash. Supreme Court published opinion — 942099.pdf
- Wash. Supreme Court published opinion — 942099.pdf
- Wash. Supreme Court published opinion — 942099.pdf
Full Text
530 charsIn accordance with the language, context, and purpose of WLAD,we hold that RCW 49.60.210(1) prohibits prospective employers from engaging in 21 For the current opinion, go to https://www.lexisnexis.com/clients/wareports/. Jin Zhu V. ESD 171, No. 94209-9 retaliatory discrimination againstjob applicants. Therefore, the answer to the certified question is yes. 22 For the current opinion, go to https://www.lexisnexis.com/clients/wareports/. Jin Zhu V. ESD 171, No. 94209-9 WE CONCUR: 'hlA ■ tA (7 dojin^ , ju / y- 23