Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Fellows v. Martin, 217 Conn. 57 (1991)

Citation
Fellows v. Martin, 217 Conn. 57 (1991)
Parent Document
Fellows v. Martin, 217 Conn. 57 (1991)
Jurisdiction
Connecticut (state)
Effective Date
1991-01-01

Other Sections in This Document (44)

Full Text

435 chars
The tenant’s trial court motions for reargument and for articulation appear to reflect the same understanding, because the court was asked to focus its attention on the alleged availability of equitable relief under CUTPA. Nowhere in the motion for articulation did the tenant ask the trial court to explain whether and why it had refused to deny summary process on equitable grounds in relation to the first count of the counterclaim.