Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Fellows v. Martin, 217 Conn. 57 (1991)

Citation
Fellows v. Martin, 217 Conn. 57 (1991)
Parent Document
Fellows v. Martin, 217 Conn. 57 (1991)
Jurisdiction
Connecticut (state)
Effective Date
1991-01-01

Other Sections in This Document (44)

Full Text

391 chars
Peters, C. J., with whom Callahan, J.,
joins, concurring. I concur in the judgment that, in the circumstances of this case, summary process would result in so unwarranted a forfeiture that the trial court should not have granted possession to the landlord. Neither the briefs nor the record, however, furnish a basis for the majority opinion’s sweeping changes in the law of summary process.