Showing 21–40 of 1,292 results
sticker was first on Mr. Swanson's locker earlier than 30 days prior to Mr. Swanson's retaliation complaint to the Office of the Mayor, I do not consider it in determining whether SCL violated Chapter 42.41 RCW and Chapter
give effect to that plain meaning as an expression of legislative intent.” Id. The exhaustion requirement for SMC retaliation claims is set forth in SMC 4.20.860-.870. To pursue an SMC retaliation claim in court, the employee must
that “to avoid summary judgment on causation, the employee must show only that a reasonable jury could find that retaliation was a substantial factor in the adverse employment decision.”). But the circumstantial evidence that Danielson was demoted after he accused
summary judgment. The same analysis from the WLAD section above also applies to the retaliation claim alleged by Billings. “An employer may not retaliate against an employee for opposing the employer’s discriminatory practices or for filing a discrimination claim
NYCHA regarding the conditions in his apartment would create a rebuttable{**41 Misc 3d at 613} presumption of retaliation if Mr. Barr served his notice to quit within six months after those complaints were made
parties do not dispute that the retaliation claim before us should be "analyzed under the same burden-shifting framework established for" other discrimination cases (Treglia v Town of Manlius, 313 F3d 713, 719 [2d Cir 2002]). Under this approach
City of Syracuse. It is unlawful to rent such dwelling without a Rental Registry Certificate. Non-payment action and Retaliation Real Property Law§ 223-b Real Property Law (RPL) § 223—b entitled "Retaliation by landlord against tenant" states in relevant
decline to dismiss the sixth, eighth and tenth causes of action as against defendant Barnes. Defendants contend that the retaliation claims (the seventh and ninth causes of action) should be dismissed as against the Dakota and Barnes for failure
majority decision which found as a matter of law that the commencement of this eviction proceeding was not in retaliation for the tenant having successfully prosecuted a personal injury action against the landlord based upon a condition in the building
Whether the Statutory Presumption of Retaliation Applies According to Mr. Barr, he commenced this proceeding because in August 2012 Mr. Huggins refused to pay his rent and told him to take him to court. In light of Mr. Huggins’ testimony
Complaint by tenants; retaliation prohibited. (a) In an attempt to provide an opportunity for corrective action to occur without the initiation of a field investigation, unless there are allegations of health hazardous conditions, the director may request a complainant
562A.36Retaliatory conduct prohibited. 1 Except as provided in this section, a landlord may not retaliate by increasing rent or decreasing services or by bringing or threatening to bring an action for possession after: a The tenant has complained
Retaliation: Retaliation includes, but is not limited to, any form of intimidation, retaliation, or harassment. It is retaliation for an employer to take any of the following with respect to a person because that person has engaged
Retaliation prohibited A. It is a violation of this Chapter 7.24 for any person to retaliate against a tenant or prospective tenant because the tenant or prospective tenant exercised or attempted to exercise rights conferred by this Chapter 7.24. Retaliation
unit to vacate such dwelling unit or to surrender or waive any rights in relation to such occupancy. B. Retaliation Prohibited. Retaliation against a Tenant because of the Tenant's exercise of rights under the TPO is prohibited. Retaliation claims
only adverse action was the unpaid suspension. 18 VRP at 2500. It asserted both the discrimination claims and the retaliation claim should fail anyway because the county suspended Verduzco for his “unprofessional conduct,” rather than his race, ethnicity, disability
believe that while acting in his[/her] capacity as Port Commissioner, [Mr. O’Neil/Ms. Stevens and] Mr. Keller retaliated against Port Employee Executive Director Diahann Howard when they voted to suspend Diahann Howard 2 weeks after findings that Mr. Keller
trial court correctly ruled that charge 12, alleging retaliation against Executive Director Howard, is factually and legally sufficient in all three petitions A. Factual sufficiency As noted above, charge 12 of each recall petition alleges: My review of the referenced
officials enough information to respond to the charges, (2) it reports Myers’ firsthand belief that she was subject to retaliation, and (3) the charge is supported by the context and supporting documents of the petition as a whole. A voter
ridding the workplace from retaliatory treatment deserves an even higher priority, the law must also preclude advance waivers of retaliation claims. In Bernhardt v. Los Angeles County, 339 F.3d 920 (9th Cir. 2003), the court entered a preliminary injunction against