Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Citation
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Jurisdiction
- Washington (state)
- Source verification
- official_capture_completeness_unverified
- Original Source
- https://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/850661.pdf ↗
Related Parts of This Source
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
Full Text
1,748 charsreasons. Worden v. Smith, 178 Wn. App. 309, 322-23, 314 P.3d 1125 (2013). Also relevant here, we construe municipal ordinances according to the rules of statutory interpretation. City of Seattle v. Swanson, 193 Wn. App. 795, 810, 373 P.3d 342 (2016). “When the meaning of statutory language is plain on its face, we give effect to that plain meaning as an expression of legislative intent.” Id. The exhaustion requirement for SMC retaliation claims is set forth in SMC 4.20.860-.870. To pursue an SMC retaliation claim in court, the employee must 9 For the current opinion, go to https://www.lexisnexis.com/clients/wareports/. No. 85066-1-I first file a sufficient and timely complaint with the Director. SMC 4.20.870(A)-(B). A complaint is sufficient if it “asserts facts that, if true, would show: [a] the employee is a cooperating employee; 2 [b] the employee was subjected to an adverse change or changes that occurred within the prescribed time period; 3 and [c] the employee’s protected conduct reasonably appears to have been a contributing factor.” SMC § 4.20.860(B)(3). A complaint is timely if it is filed “within 180 days of when [the employee] reasonably should have known that an occurrence alleged to constitute retaliation occurred.” SMC 4.20.860(A). If the Director determines the complaint to be sufficient, the Director may either (a) investigate the complaint to determine if there is reasonable cause to believe that retaliation occurred or (b) “choose not to investigate a complaint if the matter is being pursued in another forum.” SMC § 4.20.860(C). If the Director chooses the latter option, the employee may “pursue a private cause of action under [SMC 4.20.870] . . . to enjoin further retaliation, or