Showing 41–60 of 102 results
and the defendant subsequently vacated the premises. The two months of unpaid rent, however, remained outstanding, and the plaintiff, in turn, refused the defen- dant’s request for the return of his security deposit.
The judgment is reversed to the extent that the trial court struck the claim for the return of the security deposit and the case is remanded for further proceedings according to law. The judgment is affirmed in all other respects...
...The plaintiffs had paid to the defendant a total of $10,200 in security deposits. On June 10, 2000, the plaintiffs notified the defendant of their forwarding address to ensure the proper return of their security deposit. On July 26...
...appeal from the denial of her request for an emergency security deposit. This was accomplished by depositing the appeal documents in the United States mail by certified mail, return receipt requested, addressed to the [department] and to the office of...
...The record reveals that the defendant has not made any claim for the return of its security deposit and, further, that the plaintiff was discharged from any liability under the lease with Foursquare Associates. We conclude that the court’s...
The referee found that under § 47a-21 (d) (2), the defendants were hable to the plaintiffs for failure to return their security deposit. The relevant language of § 47a-21 (d) (2) provides: “Upon termination of a tenancy, any tenant may...
...there may have been as to this matter is now academic, as [the plaintiff] is ‘off the hook’ [with respect to its lease with Foursquare Associates], and no request is currently being made for the return of the security deposit. ”
...The plaintiff, after the defendant filed a request to revise, filed a *158revised, amended complaint based on one count for the return of the security deposit and for double damages.
...appeal from the denial of her request for an emergency security deposit. This was accomplished by depositing the appeal documents in the United States mail by certified mail, return receipt requested, addressed to the commissioner of the department of social...
...After the leasehold expired, the defendant sent the plaintiff an account- ing of the security deposit, indicating that no portion of it would be returned due to unpaid rent and fees due under the lease and expenses incurred to repair...
...the trial court rendered in accordance with a report submitted by an attorney trial referee (referee) in a dispute with the plaintiffs, Brady *817Baxter and Cynthia Masters, over a residential lease agreement arid the return of a security deposit.2
...The court awarded the plaintiff $400, the amount of her security deposit, and doubled the damages, increasing the award to $800 pursuant to General Statutes § 47a-21 (d) (2) for the defendant’s failure to return the security deposit on...
...The fourth count is based on a claimed failure to return the plaintiffs’ security deposit and is discussed in part III herein.
...the development company and its owners,1 to return their security deposit at the end of their lease. At the conclusion of the lease, the defendants retained $1334 of the deposit to cover damages for cleaning and repairs to the...
...2)] Interest accrued on the security deposit from April 17, 1998 to November 24, 1999 in the amount of Seventy Dollars and Sixty-nine Cents ($70.69).” The commissioner sent this order, certified mail, return receipt requested on November 30...
...month’s rent and a deposit for a key or any special equipment.” The commissioner then concluded that the tenant had paid an $1800 security deposit to the landlord, which she failed to return, with interest, minus any properly itemized...
...The court further articulated that “the defendant’s actions, in their totality, including returning the plaintiffs security deposit related to the underlying tenancy, were *326
...only, as the plaintiff has not raised any claims as to the judgment for the defendants on counts five and six of their counterclaim awarding Yeagher and the corporation $10,000 for the plaintiffs failure to return the security deposit.
...by an attorney trial referee (referee) recommending judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, Mary Fitzpatrick and Charles Morgan, the sublessors in this residential housing action for the return of a security deposit. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The plaintiffs did not classify count one as a breach of contract claim and, at trial, the defendant acknowledged that count one “alleg[ed] the failure to return the security deposit.” The defendant does not claim that it lacked notice...