Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Citation
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Parent Document
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut (state)
- Effective Date
- 2000-03-14
Other Sections in This Document (30)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola's, 56 Conn. App. 858 (2000)
Full Text
791 charsIn its brief, the plaintiff concedes, and the record supports, that the defendant paid all but the final month’s rent. The court’s conclusion with respect to all but the last month’s rent is, therefore, not clearly erroneous. Regarding the final month’s rent, the plaintiff argues that the court improperly concluded that the defendant’s security deposit should be applied to satisfy the unpaid rent. The record reveals that the defendant has not made any claim for the return of its security deposit and, further, that the plaintiff was discharged from any liability under the lease with Foursquare Associates. We conclude that the court’s finding that the security deposit constituted the defendant’s final rent payment was, therefore, supported by the record and not clearly erroneous. II