INTERNAL PROTOTYPE — NOT LEGAL ADVICE — DO NOT SEND

HASLAM-JAMES v. Lawrence, 35 A.3d 368 (2012)

Citation
HASLAM-JAMES v. Lawrence, 35 A.3d 368 (2012)
Parent Document
HASLAM-JAMES v. Lawrence, 35 A.3d 368 (2012)
Jurisdiction
Connecticut (state)
Effective Date
2012-01-31
Original Source
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2326384/haslam-james-v-lawrence/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (50)

Full Text

392 chars 
As to the third count, the court articulated that the actions of the defendant, “given the nature of the stipulated agreement and the evidence adduced at trial,” did not constitute a practice prohibited under CUTPA. The court further articulated that “the defendant’s actions, in their totality, including returning the plaintiffs security deposit related to the underlying tenancy, were *326