Johnson v. Mazza, 80 Conn. App. 155 (2003)
- Citation
- Johnson v. Mazza, 80 Conn. App. 155 (2003)
- Parent Document
- Johnson v. Mazza, 80 Conn. App. 155 (2003)
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut (state)
- Effective Date
- 2003-11-11
- Original Source
- https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/7912426/johnson-v-mazza/ ↗
Other Sections in This Document (24)
- Johnson v. Mazza, 80 Conn. App. 155 (2003)
- Johnson v. Mazza, 80 Conn. App. 155 (2003)
- Johnson v. Mazza, 80 Conn. App. 155 (2003)
- Johnson v. Mazza, 80 Conn. App. 155 (2003)
- Johnson v. Mazza, 80 Conn. App. 155 (2003)
- Johnson v. Mazza, 80 Conn. App. 155 (2003)
- Johnson v. Mazza, 80 Conn. App. 155 (2003)
- Johnson v. Mazza, 80 Conn. App. 155 (2003)
- Johnson v. Mazza, 80 Conn. App. 155 (2003)
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
Full Text
847 charsOn December 18, 2001, the defendant filed a motion for summary judgment, alleging that the plaintiffs claims were barred by the doctrine of collateral estop-pel.3 On December 26, 2001, the plaintiff filed a request to amend the complaint, seeking to add a new count for the return of the security deposit and for double damages pursuant to General Statutes § 47a-21. On December 28, 2001, the plaintiff filed an objection to the defendant’s motion for summary judgment, asserting that he was going to withdraw the claims. The court granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment on January 10, 2002. The court granted the request to amend on January 31, 2002. The plaintiff, after the defendant filed a request to revise, filed a *158revised, amended complaint based on one count for the return of the security deposit and for double damages.