Section 17203
- Citation
- Section 17203
- Parent Document
- Kraus v. Trinity Management Services, Inc., 999 P.2d 718 (2000)
- Jurisdiction
- California (state)
- Effective Date
- 2000-06-05
Other Sections in This Document (353)
- Kraus v. Trinity Management Services, Inc., 999 P.2d 718 (2000)
- Kraus v. Trinity Management Services, Inc., 999 P.2d 718 (2000)
- Kraus v. Trinity Management Services, Inc., 999 P.2d 718 (2000)
- Kraus v. Trinity Management Services, Inc., 999 P.2d 718 (2000)
- Kraus v. Trinity Management Services, Inc., 999 P.2d 718 (2000)
- Kraus v. Trinity Management Services, Inc., 999 P.2d 718 (2000)
- Kraus v. Trinity Management Services, Inc., 999 P.2d 718 (2000)
- Kraus v. Trinity Management Services, Inc., 999 P.2d 718 (2000)
- Kraus v. Trinity Management Services, Inc., 999 P.2d 718 (2000)
- Kraus v. Trinity Management Services, Inc., 999 P.2d 718 (2000)
- Kraus v. Trinity Management Services, Inc., 999 P.2d 718 (2000)
- Kraus v. Trinity Management Services, Inc., 999 P.2d 718 (2000)
- Kraus v. Trinity Management Services, Inc., 999 P.2d 718 (2000)
- Kraus v. Trinity Management Services, Inc., 999 P.2d 718 (2000)
- Kraus v. Trinity Management Services, Inc., 999 P.2d 718 (2000)
- Kraus v. Trinity Management Services, Inc., 999 P.2d 718 (2000)
- Kraus v. Trinity Management Services, Inc., 999 P.2d 718 (2000)
- Kraus v. Trinity Management Services, Inc., 999 P.2d 718 (2000)
- Kraus v. Trinity Management Services, Inc., 999 P.2d 718 (2000)
- Kraus v. Trinity Management Services, Inc., 999 P.2d 718 (2000)
- Kraus v. Trinity Management Services, Inc., 999 P.2d 718 (2000)
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17200
- Section 17200
- Section 17200
- Section 17200
- Section 17200
- Section 17200
- Section 17200
- Section 17200
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17535
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
- Section 17203
Full Text
1,707 charsThe majority's statement is dictum because, as the majority elsewhere recognizes (maj. opn., ante, 96 Cal.Rptr.2d at p. 501, 999 P.2d at p. 733), there is no realistic possibility of repetitive suits by nonparties in this case. Its statement is imprudent because such details of case management are best left to the trial court and the parties in the first instance, rather than to an appellate court with its limited ability to foresee the course of future litigation and to create remedies in the abstract for potential problems that might or might not arise. Most importantly, the majority's proposal that a nonparty must give up whatever other non-UCL claims it may have in order to receive restitution for its UCL claims is on its merits dubious and unnecessary. No question of dual liability would arise from permitting a nonparty to receive UCL restitution in the first action and to bring a subsequent action on its non-UCL claims: to the extent UCL restitution already paid overlaps with damages suffered as a result of the non-UCL claims, the defendant would be entitled to credit in the subsequent action for the restitution already paid, just as it would be entitled to credit if the UCL and non-UCL claims were brought in a single action. Moreover, if a nonparty were required to bring a separate action on both its UCL and non-UCL claims to preserve its non-UCL claims, the nonparty could in the *504 separate action prevent the defendant from contesting the merits of the UCL claim by invoking collateral estoppel, making the defendant's liability a foregone conclusion and the relitigation of the UCL claim a wasteful and pointless exercise. Concurring and Dissenting Opinion by WERDEGAR, J.