INTERNAL PROTOTYPE — NOT LEGAL ADVICE — DO NOT SEND

Section 17203

Citation
Section 17203
Parent Document
Kraus v. Trinity Management Services, Inc., 999 P.2d 718 (2000)
Jurisdiction
California (state)
Effective Date
2000-06-05
Original Source
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1159700/kraus-v-trinity-management-serv... ↗

Other Sections in This Document (353)

Full Text

629 chars 
Rejecting a claim that the statutory authority to make orders necessary to restore money "which may have been acquired" through an unlawful practice required proof of each transaction in order to determine that each claimant had been defrauded, we also held that section 17535 authorized a court to order restitution without showing the individual's lack of knowledge of the fraudulent practice in each transaction. (Fletcher, supra, 23 Cal.3d at pp. 450, 452, 153 Cal.Rptr. 28, 591 P.2d 51.) We had no occasion to consider whether an order for disgorgement *498 into a into a fluid recovery fund was authorized by section 17203.