Section 1950

Citation: Section 1950
Parent Document: Granberry v. Islay Investments, 889 P.2d 970 (1995)
Jurisdiction: California (state)
Effective Date: 1995-03-06
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1436586/granberry-v-islay-investments/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (169)

Granberry v. Islay Investments, 889 P.2d 970 (1995)
Granberry v. Islay Investments, 889 P.2d 970 (1995)
Granberry v. Islay Investments, 889 P.2d 970 (1995)
Granberry v. Islay Investments, 889 P.2d 970 (1995)
Granberry v. Islay Investments, 889 P.2d 970 (1995)
Granberry v. Islay Investments, 889 P.2d 970 (1995)
Granberry v. Islay Investments, 889 P.2d 970 (1995)
Granberry v. Islay Investments, 889 P.2d 970 (1995)
Granberry v. Islay Investments, 889 P.2d 970 (1995)
Granberry v. Islay Investments, 889 P.2d 970 (1995)
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950

Full Text

554 chars

Furthermore, even if the complete loss of a claim resulting from thé running of a limitations period could properly be characterized as a penalty, it would still be incorrect to characterize the expiration of the landlord’s setoff right under section 1950.5(f) as a penalty. As explained above, the landlord whose setoff right under section 1950.5(f) lapses does not forfeit any claims against the tenant, which the landlord can still pursue in an independent action against the tenant, but only loses the right to satisfy the claims out of the security.