Section 1950

Citation: Section 1950
Parent Document: Granberry v. Islay Investments, 889 P.2d 970 (1995)
Jurisdiction: California (state)
Effective Date: 1995-03-06
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1436586/granberry-v-islay-investments/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (169)

Granberry v. Islay Investments, 889 P.2d 970 (1995)
Granberry v. Islay Investments, 889 P.2d 970 (1995)
Granberry v. Islay Investments, 889 P.2d 970 (1995)
Granberry v. Islay Investments, 889 P.2d 970 (1995)
Granberry v. Islay Investments, 889 P.2d 970 (1995)
Granberry v. Islay Investments, 889 P.2d 970 (1995)
Granberry v. Islay Investments, 889 P.2d 970 (1995)
Granberry v. Islay Investments, 889 P.2d 970 (1995)
Granberry v. Islay Investments, 889 P.2d 970 (1995)
Granberry v. Islay Investments, 889 P.2d 970 (1995)
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950
Section 1950

Full Text

419 chars

The majority, however, holds that landlords who violate Civil Code section 1950.5’s requirement to set off and refund security within the statutory period may nonetheless later raise their claims as setoff against the security. I dissent because the majority’s holding ignores the statutory language, disrupts the statutory scheme, and disserves the statute’s purpose. Section 1950.5 will now become a toothless remedy.