Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

§ 1805

Citation
§ 1805
Parent Document
Action Apartment Ass'n v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 114 Cal. Rptr. 2d 412 (2002)
Jurisdiction
California (state)
Effective Date
2002-01-03

Other Sections in This Document (232)

Full Text

653 chars
As one leading treatise has explained: “All security deposits received by a landlord are held for the benefit of his tenants, and subject to total or partial refund, and a tenant’s claim for refund has priority over the claims of the landlord’s creditors. The deposits are subject to refund to the tenant at the termination of the tenancy, after lawful deductions; there are no ‘nonrefundable’ or ‘forfeitable’ security deposits, and the right of the tenant to receive a refund cannot be altered or modified by any agreement between the parties.” (6 Miller & Starr, Cal. Real Estate (2d ed. 1989) § 18:78, p. 183, fns. omitted; see Civ. Code, § 1950.5.)