Skip to main content
INTERNAL PROTOTYPE — NOT LEGAL ADVICE — DO NOT SEND

Akassy v. William Penn Apartments Ltd. Partnership, 891 A.2d 291 (2006)

Citation
Akassy v. William Penn Apartments Ltd. Partnership, 891 A.2d 291 (2006)
Parent Document
Akassy v. William Penn Apartments Ltd. Partnership, 891 A.2d 291 (2006)
Jurisdiction
DC (municipal)
Effective Date
2006-02-02

Other Sections in This Document (202)

Full Text

350 chars
. The tenant argues for the first time in his reply brief that his single breach of the consent order by failing to pay the challenged rent increase constitutes a compelling reason to disallow forfeiture of his tenancy. This issue was not raised in the landlord’s brief, and therefore, the argument exceeds the permissible scope of a reply brief. See