Akassy v. William Penn Apartments Ltd. Partnership, 891 A.2d 291 (2006)

Citation: Akassy v. William Penn Apartments Ltd. Partnership, 891 A.2d 291 (2006)
Parent Document: Akassy v. William Penn Apartments Ltd. Partnership, 891 A.2d 291 (2006)
Jurisdiction: DC (municipal)
Effective Date: 2006-02-02
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2167433/akassy-v-william-penn-apartment... ↗

Full Text

595 chars

Specifically, he contends that the tenant failed to show that he would be irreparably harmed if the stay were not granted, that the landlord would not suffer harm or that the public interest would be served by granting the stay. “To prevail on a motion for stay, a movant must show that he or she is likely to succeed on the merits, that irreparable injury will result if the stay is denied, that opposing parties will not be harmed by a stay, and that the public interest favors the granting of a stay.” Barry v. Washington Post Co., 529 A.2d 319, 320-21 (D.C.1987) (citing In re Antioch Univ.,

Other Sections in This Document (202)

Full Text