Alden v. Richardson (2017)

Citation: Alden v. Richardson (2017)
Parent Document: Alden v. Richardson (2017)
Jurisdiction: Vermont (state)
Effective Date: 2017-04-14
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/10026635/alden-v-richardson/ ↗

Full Text

591 chars

Ms. Alden claims that the cleaning charge should be removed because she cleaned the
apartment before she vacated and no receipt for the expense was presented by Mr. Richardson.
The record did include a $300 estimate of the cleaning expense by Mr. Richardson and Ms.
Alden did not challenge that at the hearing. The record also included evidence that the apartment
had been left in a state that required cleaning after Ms. Alden vacated. The finding is not without
supporting evidence and did not require more tangible evidence, such as a receipt, than was
provided. 8.      Holes in the wall

Other Sections in This Document (31)

Full Text